-
-
- Council Members
- Role of Council Members
- Council meetings
- Council elections
- Previous election results
- Dr Louise Allum
- Dr Sam Bescoby
- Dr Andrew Clemence
- Dr Tshidi Gardiner
- Dr Reginald Godwin
- Paddy Gordon
- Dr Danielle Greenberg
- Dr Gerard Henry
- Dr Richard Hillman
- Dr Benjamin Kennedy
- Dr Tom Lonsdale
- Dr Darren Partridge
- Martin Peaty
- Alison Price
- Dr Peter Robinson
- Dr Jennifer Simmons
- Dr Sadie Spencer
- Dr Mary Thomas
- William Wilkinson
- Dr Lara Wilson
- Past-Presidents
-
- Advancement of the Professions Committee
- Standards Committee
- Audit and Risk Committee
- Education Committee
- Disciplinary Committee
- Charter Case Committee
- Preliminary Investigation Committee and Disciplinary Committee Liaison Committee
- Registration Committee
- Preliminary Investigation Committee
- Paper classification: some definitions
-
-
-
-
-
- About extra-mural studies (EMS)
- EMS requirements
- Information for vet students
- Information for EMS providers
- Information for vet schools
- Temporary EMS requirements
- Practice by students - regulations
- Health and safety on EMS placements
- EMS contacts and further guidance
- Extra-mural studies fit for the future
-
-
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Nurses
- Contact the Advice Team
- XL Bully dog ban
- 'Under care' - guidance
- Advice on Schedule 3
- Controlled Drugs Guidance – A to Z
- Dealing with Difficult Situations webinar recordings
- FAQs – Common medicines pitfalls
- FAQs – Routine veterinary practice and clinical veterinary research
- FAQs – Advertising of practice names
- GDPR – RCVS information and Q&As
-
- Accrediting veterinary degrees
- Accrediting veterinary nursing qualifications
- Reasonable adjustments for student vets
- Reasonable adjustments for student veterinary nurses
- Health and disability in veterinary nurse education and training
- Reasonable adjustments for students and the UK disability discrimination legislation
- Educational assessment of veterinary nurses
- Roles of key stakeholders in the application of reasonable adjustments
- Examples of reasonable adjustments for vet nurse students
- External review of the RCVS by ENQA
- Requirements for remote and online student assessments
Disciplinary Committee hearings
Details of the most recent Disciplinary Committee (DC) hearings are set out below.
Please note: this page is currently being updated (31/01/25)
2025
| Date | Respondent | Documents | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/25 | Ng, Siew Loong | ||
| 19/05/25 | Kane, William Patrick | ||
| 12/05/25 | Wood, Maximilian | ||
| 31/03/25 | Georgescu, Razvan | Decision of Unfitness to Practise and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 19/03/25 | Bucur, Anca | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 10/03/25 | Johnson, Dayna | ||
| 27/02/25 | Cole, Gemma Louise | Decision on Proceeding in Absence Decision on Proof of the Conviction Charged Decision on Unfitness to Practice |
|
| 26/02/25 | Bowler, Emma Kathleen | Original hearing heard between 21/10/24-25/10/24. | |
| 06/01/25 | Evans, Emma Jane |
2024
| Date | Respondent | Documents | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/24 | Miles, Shakira | ||
| 28/10/24 | Johnston, Donal | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearing on 1 November 2022. |
| 14/10/24 | Hauptfleisch, George Philippus | ||
| 07/10/24 | Bowles, Brian Cullen | Decision on Proceeding in Absence |
|
| 30/09/24 | Gurrin, Nicola Jane | The redactions applied to the Decision document relate to references to the health of a third party, which the Committee decided should be dealt with in private session. | |
| 24/09/24 | Parody, Janine Susan | The redactions applied to the Decision document relate to references to Dr Parody’s health, which the Committee decided should be dealt with in private session. | |
| 27/08/24 | Lesolle, Mpho Donald | ||
| 24/07/24 | Nicholls, Bronwyn Anne | ||
| 22/07/24 | Shillabeer, Edmund Harold | ||
| 11/07/24 | Yates, Paige |
|
The hearing has been adjourned and will shortly be re-listed. |
| 17/06/24 | Radev, Nikolay Kirilov | ||
| 11/06/24 | Rushton, Jamie Francis | ||
| 06/06/24 | Fioletti, Alberto Giacomo | Decision on Proceeding in Absence |
|
| 08/05/24 | Mulvey, Susan Catherine | Decision on Proceeding in Absence and Finding of Facts |
15/08/24 Although Dr Mulvey initially indicated her intention to appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCDC) against the DC's decision, the JCDC has recently confirmed that Dr Mulvey did not pursue this appeal. As such, Dr Mulvey's name has now been removed from the Register. |
| 22/04/24 | Petrovic, Nebojsa | ||
| 15/04/24 | Makepeace, Matthew John | ||
| 03/04/24 | Murray, Kai | ||
| 26/03/24 | Alcock, Karen Marie | ||
| 18/03/24 | Mrs D, a Registered Veterinary Nurse | The Disciplinary Committee’s findings and decisions have been anonymised due to exceptional circumstances. | |
| 12/03/24 | Russell, Robert William | ||
| 19/02/24 | Francis, Jemma Louise | ||
| 12/02/24 | Kettle, Michael James | ||
2023
| Date | Respondent | Documents | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/12/23 | Butnaru, Vlad |
||
| 30/11/23 | Briggs, Amelia |
||
| 06/11/23 | B, a Registered Veterinary Nurse |
The Disciplinary Committee's findings and decisions have been anonymised due to exceptional circumstances | |
| 09/10/23 | Kalisz, Sylwia |
||
| 28/09/23 | Wood, Simon Peter |
||
| 18/09/23 | Grecko, Alina |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Sanction Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 04/09/23 | Butnaru, Vlad |
|
The hearing has been adjourned and will shortly be re-listed. |
| 31/07/23 | Herdman, Melanie |
||
| 20/07/23 | Dobson, Andrew |
||
| 29/06/23 | Seymour-Hamilton, Warwick John |
||
| 19/06/23 | Antonovs, Pavels |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct |
|
| 24/04/23 | Wicksteed, Joanna |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Finding of Facts |
|
| 27/03/23 | Morris, Libby |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Finding of Facts Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 20/03/23 | Power, Katharine | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Findings of Fact Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearings on 28 November 2022 and 20 February 2023. |
| 09/03/23 | Burrows, Nicola |
||
| 20/02/23 | Hutton, Simon |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
2022
| Date | Respondent | Documents | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/22 | Gracey, James | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on abuse of process and admissibility Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Findings of Fact Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearing on 22 July 2022. |
| 01/11/22 | Johnston, Donal | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearing on 28 April 2022. |
| 25/10/22 | A, a Registered Veterinary Nurse | The Disciplinary Committee’s findings and decisions have been anonymised due to exceptional circumstances. | |
| 27/09/22 | Heyes, Katherine | ||
| 22/09/22 | Prichard, Stephen | ||
| 21/09/22 | Strangeway, Chelsea Jade | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Proceeding in Absence Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 02/09/22 | Dyson, Sue | ||
| 22/08/22 | Hazelwood, Stephanie | ||
| 14/06/22 | McKinstry, Alexander Rutherford, Andrew Inman, Rebecca |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
|
| 08/06/22 | Seymour-Hamilton, Warwick John |
||
| 25/05/22 | Doherty, Daniel |
Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts and Unfitness to Practise Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Respondent's Application for Recusal |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearing on 6 April 2022. |
| 25/04/22 | Roger, Paul Anderson | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect |
This hearing covered proceedings from the adjourned hearing on 19 November 2021. |
| 24/03/22 | Registered Nurse | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Proceeding in Absence and Finding of Facts Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Disgraceful Conduct in a Professional Respect and Sanction |
Due to exceptional circumstances, the Disciplinary Committee's findings and decisions in this case have been anonymised, and no press release has been issued. |
| 23/03/22 | Mostert, Dr Craig | Mr Mostert lodged an appeal against the Disciplinary Committee decision with the Privy Council on 28 April 2022 and he remained on the Register pending the outcome of the appeal. The appeal has now been withdrawn. | |
| 10/03/22 | Surdila, Dr Claudia Elena | ||
| 07/03/22 | Hill, Dr Anke | ||
| 14/02/22 | Dingemanse, Dr Walter | ||
| 31/01/22 | Mullen, Anne Mary | Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Proceeding in Absence Decision of the Disciplinary Committee on Facts Decision of the Disciplinary Committee as to Disgraceful Conduct |
About the Disciplinary Committee
The RCVS Disciplinary Committee (DC) hears cases relating to registered veterinary surgeons and the Veterinary Nurse Disciplinary Committee (VN DC) hear cases relating to registered veterinary nurses. Both committees follow court procedures.
Complaints must be proven to the highest civil standard of proof, ie the Committee must be satisfied 'so as to be sure' the facts have occurred as alleged by the College.
The Committee must also be satisfied that the facts as proved amount to serious professional misconduct.
Attending a hearing?
If you are attending a hearing as a witness, or would like an overview of the procedure of a Disciplinary Hearing you can read our section on 'Being a witness at a Disciplinary Committee hearing – frequently asked questions' for further information.
Disciplinary Committee hearings are generally conducted in public although some evidence may be heard in private where the Committee consider it appropriate.
Hearing outcomes
If found guilty of serious professional misconduct and ordered to be suspended or struck off the Register, a veterinary surgeon may appeal to the Privy Council within 28 days. If appealed, the order does not take effect unless and until it is upheld by the Privy Council.
If found guilty of serious professional misconduct and ordered to be suspended or struck off the Register, a registered veterinary nurse may at any time within 28 days from the notice of direction, lodge an appeal which will be considered in accordance with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Veterinary Nurse Conduct and Discipline Rules 2014.
Committee guidance
Guidance on the Disciplinary Committee’s functions, decision-making, and approach to sanctions can be found in the “Disciplinary Committee Sanctions Guidance for Veterinary Surgeons cases” which was re-issued in August 2020 and is used as an aid to decision making at Disciplinary Hearings.
This guidance document (available to download from the bottom of this page) should be read in conjunction with the 'Disciplinary Committee Manual,' re-issued in September 2013.
Updated publication scheme
In line with the UK General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) and individuals’ right to have personal data erased (also known as ‘right to be forgotten’) we have updated our data retention policy concerning the information we continue to publish on our website about recent and historical Disciplinary Committee (DC) hearings.
The length of time that we will continue to publish the outcome of DC hearings is now determined by the outcome, decision and judgment of the Committee, as set out in the updated publication scheme.
As such, some DC hearings listed on this page under our previous three-year publication scheme have now been removed.
If you have any questions about this change, or need details of DC hearings not listed here, please contact out Professional Conduct team: [email protected]
| Hearing/outcome type | Online publication period |
| Removal, following DC hearing | Three years (unless restored before, see below) |
| Successful application for restoration | For remaining time of three-year period, or three months (whichever is the greater) |
| Unsuccessful application for restoration | For remaining time of three-year period, or three months (if lodged after initial three-year period) |
| Suspension, following DC hearing | 18 months (or same as suspension period if longer) |
| Warning/reprimand, following DC hearing |
12 months |
| Finding of misconduct, following DC hearing, but no sanction imposed | 9 months |
| Warning, following Charter Case Protocol hearing | 6 months |
| No misconduct found / facts found not proven | 3 months |
| Appeal lodged against DC decision | Original information remains online for indicated period. Explanatory note added. |
| Appeal lodged against DC decision – various outcomes | Consider on a case-by-case basis depending on outcome of appeal, following guidelines above. |