- Council Members
- Role of Council Members
- Council meetings
- Council elections
- VN Council members
- VN Council meetings
- Membership of committees & sub-committees
- VN Council elections
- Standards Committee
- Advancement of the Professions Committee
- Audit and Risk Committee
- Education Committee
- Finance and Resources Committee
- Disciplinary Committee
- Charter Case Committee
- Preliminary Investigation Committee
- Paper classification: some definitions
- Veterinary Legislation Review
- Information for MPs
- Environment and Sustainability Working Party
- The Limited Licensure & Reasonable Adjustment Working Party
- Completing your annual renewal
- Amending your registration
- Voluntary removal and restoration
- Replacement Membership Certificates
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Disclosing convictions and/or adverse findings
- VetGDP Advisers
- Practices and workplaces
- Graduates and students
- VetGDP information to help you get started
- VetGDP FAQs
- Overseas vets
- Vets returning to the UK Practising Register after 5+ years away
- Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs)
- Overview of practice standards
- About the Practice Standards Scheme
- Which accreditation is right for your practice and how to apply
- What happens during an assessment?
- About Stanley, our support system for the PSS
- How do I update my accredited-practice information?
- How can I promote my RCVS accreditation?
- Additional training and resources
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Surgeons
- Code of Professional Conduct for Veterinary Nurses
- Contact the Advice Team
- XL Bully dog ban
- 'Under care' - new guidance
- Advice on Schedule 3
- Controlled Drugs Guidance – A to Z
- Dealing with Difficult Situations webinar recordings
- FAQs – Common medicines pitfalls
- FAQs – Routine veterinary practice and clinical veterinary research
- GDPR – RCVS information and Q&As
- Accrediting veterinary degrees
- Accrediting veterinary nursing qualifications
- External review of the RCVS by ENQA
- Requirements for remote and online student assessments
- I want to raise a concern about a veterinary surgeon
- I want to raise a concern about a registered veterinary nurse
- Confidential Reporting Line
How we assess and investigate concerns
There are 3 stages to our investigation procedure, as explained below.
Stage 1 Preliminary Investigation Committee
Your Case Manager
Once we have received your completed form, a Case Manager will be assigned to you.
They will contact you by telephone within 2 weeks to introduce themselves, provide you with their contact details and discuss your concerns.
We will disclose your concerns and all the information you provide to the veterinary surgeon. Please note: if you wish to remain anonymous, or for your identity to remain confidential, we cannot complete this step which may result in your concerns not being taken further. If you are worried about your identity being disclosed, you should discuss this with your Case Manager.
We may ask the veterinary surgeon to write to us and comment on the concerns you have raised. We will send a copy of this letter to you so that you can tell us if you agree or disagree with anything they have written.
It may not be necessary for us to contact the veterinary surgeon if we have received enough information from you to allow us to assess the concern or on the other hand, we may need to gather additional information so that we can decide what action we can take.
Your Case Manager may therefore seek information over the telephone, by email, or in writing, for example:
- from you;
- from the veterinary surgeon about whom you have concerns;
- from others at the veterinary practice ; and/or
- from anyone who you have told us may have witnessed or have knowledge about any of the incidents you are concerned about.
Your Case Manager may also ask for copies of the clinical records relating any animal you have told us about.
Our investigations could also involve:
- instructing our Veterinary Investigators to visit the veterinary surgeon who you are concerned about, and/or to visit you and anyone else who may have knowledge about the incidents, and to report back to the Case Manager;
- obtaining formal witness statements (from you and others); and/or
- obtaining expert reports.
Your Case Manager may, at any time, seek guidance about an investigation from the Chairman of the Preliminary investigation Committee or the Head of Professional Conduct at the RCVS.
Consideration by Stage 1 Preliminary Investigation Committee (Stage 1 PIC)
Once your Case Manager considers that sufficient information has been obtained to enable your concerns to be assessed (and this may be on the basis of your information alone), they will be considered by a Stage 1 PIC.
The Stage 1 PIC will ordinarily be a quorum of three members, one veterinary surgeon, one lay member and one other.
The Stage 1 PIC makes its decisions in private, so neither you, nor the veterinary surgeon you have raised concerns about, will attend any of its meetings.
The Stage 1 PIC will decide whether it can close the case at this stage, on the basis that there is no realistic prospect of the concerns raised being proved and of them amounting to serious professional misconduct.
The Stage 1 PIC can:
- close the matter with no further action;
- close the matter and issue advice to the veterinary surgeon in question; or,
- decide that it has insufficient information to conclude the matter and that the case should be referred to a Stage 2 Preliminary Investigation Committee (Stage 2 PIC), whose role it is to decide if a case should go to a Stage 3 Disciplinary Committee (DC) hearing.
Upon the authorisation of the PIC Chairman and/or the Head of Professional Conduct, concerns and/or convictions/cautions that are identified as being of a potentially serious nature may be referred directly to the Stage 2 PIC for investigations to be carried out.
We will write to both you and the veterinary surgeon concerned about the decision made by the Stage 1 PIC and the reasons for this decision.
Stage 2 Preliminary Investigation Committee
The Stage 2 PIC meets to consider whether there is a realistic prospect that what the veterinary surgeon has done, or not done, could affect their fitness to practise and amounts to serious professional misconduct, and whether the case should therefore be referred to a DC hearing, or referred to the Charter Case Committee.
The Stage 2 PIC meetings are in private, so neither you, nor the veterinary surgeon concerned, will attend any of the meetings.
The Stage 2 PIC will receive all the information and documents previously made available to the Stage 1 PIC.
Both you and the veterinary surgeon concerned will be notified if a matter is going forward to the Stage 2 PIC and will have the opportunity to provide any additional comments and information that you would like it to consider.
When the Stage 2 PIC considers matters, it may require more information before making a decision (see above for the sort of information that it may ask for).
The Stage 2 PIC will, in any event, ask the veterinary surgeon you have raised concerns about to supply details of his/her continuing professional development records for the last 3 years, as well as to confirm their indemnity insurance details.
What the Stage 2 PIC can do
The Stage 2 PIC may decide to:
- close the case with no further action;
- close the case and issue advice to the veterinary surgeon;
- refer a case to the Charter Case Committee. It will do this where it considers that there is a realistic prospect that the veterinary surgeon’s conduct falls far short of the standard expected of a reasonably competent veterinary surgeon, but that it is not in the public interest for the case to proceed to a hearing of the Disciplinary Committee (for example, because it is at the lower end of the scale of seriousness). Decisions of the Charter Case Committee may be made public, and you can see decisions from the last six months here.
- refer a complaint to the DC for a hearing. It will do this where it considers that there is a realistic prospect of the DC finding that the veterinary surgeon’s alleged conduct falls far short of the standard expected of a reasonably competent veterinary surgeon, and it considers that it is in the public interest to do so. The Stage 2 PIC will do so in particular when it takes the view that the behaviour, if proved, is fundamentally incompatible with his/her being a veterinary surgeon and this may include any behaviours in the following (non-exhaustive) list:
- Very poor professional performance where there has been a serious departure from the standards set out in the RCVS Code of Professional Conduct;
- Causing, or causing risk of, serious harm to animals or the public, particularly where there is a breach of trust;
- Offences of a sexual nature;
- Offences involving violence and/or loss of human life;
- Evidence of a harmful or deep-seated personality or attitude problem; and/or
- Dishonesty (including false certification), particularly where persistent or concealed;
- retain a case for ongoing monitoring under the RCVS Health Protocol; or,
- retain a case for ongoing monitoring under the RCVS Performance Protocol.
Stage 3 Disciplinary Committee hearing
If a case is referred to the Disciplinary Committee, there will be a formal hearing.
A DC hearing is like a court hearing and you will probably be asked to attend to give evidence under oath or affirmation (a solemn promise to tell the truth). Other witnesses will also usually be called to give evidence.
Generally, a DC hearing date will be offered within 15 months of the date we received your concerns form.
The veterinary surgeon may appeal to the Privy Council against a DC decision to suspend or remove them from the register.
Please view the related documents on our Disciplinary Committee page for detailed information about what it can do.