![]() |
Promoting & sustaining
public confidence in veterinary medicine |
|||||||
| Home | About RCVS | Veterinary Surgeons | Veterinary Nurses | Visitors | Practice Standards | Find a Vet | RCVS Trust | Latest News | Publications | | ||||||||
| You are here: Veterinary Surgeons > Guide to Professional Conduct > k. NVS Guidance | ||||||||
Subscribe to RCVS e-newsWebsite Toolbox |
k. NVS GuidanceRCVS Guidance for Named Veterinary Surgeons employed in Scientific Procedure Establishments and Breeding and Supplying Establishments under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986(Issued November 2004) INTRODUCTION1) The Guidance sets out the role of 'Named Veterinary Surgeon' ["the NVS"] under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 ["the 1986 Act"] and provides advice to veterinary surgeons deputising for the NVS. The 1986 Act is a UK wide Act, administered by the Home Office in Great Britain and the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS) in Northern Ireland. The Guidance is issued after consultation with the Home Office and the Laboratory Animals Veterinary Association and taking into account the 1986 Act and associated statutory guidance. 2) Scientific procedure establishments and breeding and supplying establishments are required to have a veterinary surgeon who accepts responsibility under the 1986 Act to provide advice on the health and welfare of animals within these establishments. The name of the NVS is recorded on the establishment's certificate of designation. 3) Scientific procedure establishments are places at which project licences are held and include universities (university departments and medical schools), colleges of further education, government research establishments, pharmaceutical and other industrial research and development laboratories, and contract research laboratories. No regulated procedures may be carried out unless there is a project licence covering the work to be carried out and detailing the procedures, and a personal licence holder with authority to carry out those procedures. A breeding establishment is one where the common laboratory species, as listed in Schedule 2 to the 1986 Act are bred for use in regulatedprocedures. A supplying establishment is one from which Schedule 2 animals which have not been bred on the premises are kept and supplied for use in regulated procedures. Some establishments may fall into more than one of these categories. 4) Veterinary surgeons are expected to undergo specific training for the role of NVS (see paragraph18 and 19). DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES5) The NVS should:-
7) Under this Guidance the NVS has veterinary care responsibilities to the RCVS (paragraph 5a). Contracts and visits8) A veterinary surgeon may be contracted as the NVS on a full-time or part-time basis depending upon, for example, the size of the establishment and the nature and complexity of the research programmes. The contractual hours and resources (e.g. the assistance given by other veterinary surgeons) should be adequate to enable the NVS to have sufficient time to fulfil his or her role. Whether full-time or part-time the responsibilities and statutory duties of the NVS are the same. 9) Whether the appointment is full-time or part-time, the NVS must arrange to visit the facilities on a regular basis for both advisory and veterinary care roles, rather than waiting to be called out in an emergency. In this way the NVS should become familiar with the animals, the research workers and their areas of scientific interest, as well as the procedures carried out on animals within the establishment. The frequency of these visits should be determined by the NVS according to the number and species of animals involved and the nature and severity of procedures performed. An appropriate schedule of visits should be agreed in advance in consultation with the responsible staff of the establishment, in particular with the Named Animal Care and Welfare Officer(s) ("the NACWO") and the certificate holder. The visiting schedule should be regularly reviewed and amended as necessary. 10) The job description and/or contract of the NVS should define the responsibilities involved and provide a reporting structure that gives the NVS direct access to the certificate holder at the establishment. 11) The names of the veterinary surgeons deputising for the NVS are not included on the certificate of designation. Therefore, they should be recorded at the establishment and made known to the certificate holder, the NACWO, licensees and other relevant staff in the establishment. The means of contacting an appropriate veterinary surgeon at any time should be clearly defined and available. Insurance12) The NVS and deputising veterinary surgeons are required to have professional indemnity insurance or equivalent arrangements. Such cover may be held individually or through an employer. The chosen level of indemnity related to NVS duties should be discussed with the Insurance providers, for example the Veterinary Defence Society. The level of cover can then be confirmed. Liaison and reporting13) The certificate holder is ultimately responsible for ensuring that the facilities, animal welfare and care, staffing levels and expertise in the establishment meet the requirements of the 1986 Act and the Codes of Practice. The NVS is answerable to the certificate holder in an advisory role and for providing the contracted service. Therefore the NVS should make reports (it is suggested at least annually) directly to the certificate holder. 14) Periodic meetings with the Home Office Inspector are desirable and may assist the NVS to fulfil the statutory role. The NVS should be available for discussion with the Home Office Inspector if the latter makes a request. 15) The NVS at a scientific procedure establishment should liaise closely with his/her colleagues at other associated establishments (e.g. where a research project involves collaboration between two or more establishments) and, especially if animal health problems arise in recently acquired animals, with colleagues at supplying and breeding establishments. Conflict of interest16) Where the NVS also holds a project licence, another veterinary surgeon must be agreed with the Home Office as responsible for providing independent veterinary advice regarding the health and welfare of the animals involved. If there is any other significant conflict of interest, the NVS should consider the need for independent veterinary advice. Confidentiality17) The NVS and veterinary surgeons deputising for the NVS must maintain client confidentiality as set out in the Guide to Professional Conduct. Contracts and client records, together with project and personal licences, should be stored securely to prevent any unauthorised access. Training and continuing professional development18) The Home Office requires that a new NVS attend a course, approved by the RCVS, specifically on the role of the NVS, either before or within one year of accepting appointment. In any event a new NVS should undertake training on the needs of the laboratory animals on which he or she will provide advice. 19) The NVS and veterinary surgeons assisting or deputising for the NVS are expected to participate in continuing professional development relevant to the species held and used and the type of scientific work carried out at the establishment. Training of other staff20) The NVS should be familiar with the range of scientific procedures carried out under project licences and may take part in the training of technicians and personal licence holders on animal welfare and health. In particular the NVS may be involved in the training of minor procedures, surgical methods, anaesthetic regimens, peri-operative care and assessment of competence. PROVISION OF VETERINARY SERVICESComprehensive veterinary service21) The NVS should ensure there are appropriate arrangements for the provision of veterinary services, including 24-hour emergency cover (see RCVS Guide to Professional Conduct for details). The NVS may delegate these duties to suitably competent deputies. The certificate holder is responsible for providing the necessary resources for the provision of such cover and services. Staff at the designated establishment are expected to contact the NVS or delegated deputy, to seek veterinary advice or assistance, as appropriate; but the RCVS Guide does not stipulate that staff of the designated establishment must be on site 24 hours a day. 22) The delivery of veterinary treatment and services should take into consideration the experimental procedures which the protected animals are being or will be subjected to, and that data, or other products, being collected as part of the programme of work may be compromised as a result of the veterinary intervention. 23) As a minimum the NVS should: -
DelegationTo other veterinary surgeons24) Where colleagues provide some of the veterinary services and/or deputise for duties associated with the Act, the NVS should make appropriate arrangements to ensure that delegated services are delivered. The NVS should make clear which duties and tasks are being delegated, how these should be fulfilled and how the delivery of such services should be documented. The NVS should liaise with the colleagues involved to ensure they are appropriately briefed on the scientific objectives of projects at the establishment and on the constraints and humane end-points in these projects. 25) When procedures regulated under the 1986 Act are conducted at places other than designated establishments, such as on farms or at fisheries, a local veterinary practitioner will often provide veterinary services. Good liaison between the NVS, the local practitioner, and the licence holders involved is strongly recommended to ensure neither welfare nor science is compromised. At the end of the regulated procedures the local veterinary surgeon may be able to provide any certification needed (see paragraphs 44-46). To persons who are not veterinary surgeons26) The NVS may delegate some veterinary procedures or treatment to animal care staff, within the provisions of the Veterinary Surgeons Act 1966. Special instructions should be given and these must adequately inform animal care staff on the appropriate and responsible use of minor medical treatments, for example, dealing with and recording minor injuries or topical lesions in group-housed animals. Where written instructions are not provided the NVS must ensure staff are adequately informed verbally. 27) Periodically, the NVS should check that delegated procedures or treatments and preventive medicine programmes have been carried out to a satisfactory standard and appropriate records kept. Where minor medical treatments are initiated, varied or discontinued by animal care staff, the action taken, the justification for the action, and the outcome should be recorded and the records regularly reviewed by the NVS. Prescription only medicines and controlled drugs28) The NVS is responsible for the appropriate storage, administration and safe disposal of prescription only medicines and controlled drugs obtained by him or her (including by prescription) for therapeutic purposes. 29) The Veterinary Medicines Regulations 2009 do not apply in relation to a product intended for administration in the course of a procedure licensed under the Animals (Scientific Procedure) Act 1986, except that, if the animals are to be put into the human food chain, the only products that may be administered to the animals are—
30) The NVS is expected to give guidance on the use of anaesthesia and analgesia. 31) Where carcasses of treated animals may be destined for the food chain, due regard must be paid to laws relating to tissue residues. If substances with no Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) have been used, at any stage in the procedures, the animal should not be allowed to enter the food chain. 32) European Parliament Directive 2001/82, as amended, provides that no animal may enter the food chain if it has been administered a substance that is not listed in the Table of allowed substances in Commission Regulation 37/2010 (this table replaces Annexes I, II or III of Council Regulation (EEC) 2377/90). Where a Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) has been set, any residue must be at concentrations lower than or equal to the MRL. RESPONSIBILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1986 ACTAdvice to the certificate holder32) Under the 1986 Act the prime responsibility of the NVS is to advise the certificate holder on veterinary matters. The following should be considered the minimum areas for which advice should be given:
Advice to the project licence holders33) The NVS should advise on:-
Advice to personal licence holders35) For research workers using animals the NVS should provide:-
Advice to the animal care staff37) Commonly a senior animal technician holds the position of NACWO and is the main point of contact on matters relating to the general care and husbandry of animals in the establishment. He or she is likely to be the person who contacts the NVS in cases where the health or welfare of an animal gives rise to concern. The NVS should foster a good working relationship with the NACWO(s) and other animal care staff. 38) The NVS should provide advice on maintaining health status and animal welfare issues, including socialisation and enrichment. Animals giving rise to concern39) Under the 1986 Act, if the NVS considers that the health or welfare of any protected animal gives rise to concern, he or she must notify the personal licence holder. If there is no personal licence holder (as when the animal has not undergone a regulated procedure), or if one is not available, the NVS must take steps to ensure that the animal is cared for and, if necessary, that it is humanely killed using an appropriate method. Normally problems should be resolved through discussion with the personal licence holder or project licence holder involved. There may be occasions when it is advisable to consult the certificate holder or consult or notify the Home Office Inspector. 40) The NVS should be familiar with relevant methods of humane killing listed in Schedule 1 to the 1986 Act, and with the associated Code of Practice, together with any additional approved methods set out in the conditions of the certificate of designation. Fate of animals at the end of regulated procedures41) At the end of a series of regulated procedures for a particular purpose (typically a project licence protocol) which does not specify that the animal will be killed, the 1986 Act requires that the relevant personal licence holder must, in the first instance, decide whether the animal should be killed or not. In the great majority of instances this decision is made at a designated establishment (if not see paragraphs 44-46), and if the personal licence holder's decision is that the animal need not be killed then the project licence holder is obliged to pass the matter to a veterinary surgeon, normally the NVS. If the (N)VS determines that the animal is not suffering and is not likely to suffer adverse effects from the procedures done, then the animal may be discharged into the care of the (N)VS within the designated establishment. No certificate is necessary and the principle of veterinary direction can be applied. The decision of whether an animal may remain alive can be taken by a person the NVS considers able to do so and according to specific criteria, which the NVS has defined. These criteria would normally be specified in the project licence. Should the animal subsequently move off the designated establishment veterinary certification (see paragraphs 42-43) will be needed. Certification at designated establishments42) When a protected animal, which has undergone and completed the regulated procedures, is to move off the designated establishment to a non-designated place such as a slaughterhouse, a family home or a farm, the certificate holder is obliged to request a veterinary surgeon, normally the NVS, to certify that the animal is not likely to suffer adverse effects from those regulated procedures. Guidance is given in the LAVA Guidance on the Discharge of Animals from the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (reference 6). 43) The NVS may also be involved in meeting other regulatory requirements for the transport, import or export of protected animals, including certifying fitness of animals for transport, where appropriate. Work outside designated establishments44) The NVS may be called upon to advise project licence holders about the fate of animals that have undergone procedures at non-designated establishments (referred to as "places other than designated establishments" or PODEs), such as at a farm or in the wild. 45) Similar certification to that given to animals leaving a designated place (see paragraphs 42-43) should be provided for animals which come to the end of a protocol at a place which is not designated, but the NVS may be in no position to carry out the certification (because the facts are not within his/her knowledge, e.g. wildlife, farmed fish or farm animals which may be under the care of another veterinary surgeon). If no veterinary surgeon is available at the place another "suitably qualified person" may provide this certification. The project licence holder with advice from the NVS should designate such a "suitably qualified person", who should have proven expertise at judging the health and welfare of the particular type of animals concerned. The NVS should advise on suitable training for such persons. (See reference 6). 46) Particular criteria apply for release to the wild and a distinction has to be made between release at the end of regulated procedures and release with the expectation of gathering further data (e.g. from transmitters). (See reference 6 for further details). Participation in the ethical review process47) Under a condition placed on the certificate of designation an establishment must have an ethical review process ["ERP"]. The aims of the process are:
48) The NVS is an obligatory participant in the process. In general terms, the NVS should only advise on matters within his/her professional competence, but may in addition contribute to the ERP in a lay capacity. He or she should advise the ethical review process on: -
Records50) It is important to appreciate the full implications of advice given by the NVS in the light of the statutory responsibility to advise on animal health and welfare. Considerable care must be taken to avoid ambiguity and undue delay and sometimes it may be necessary to give advice in writing. 51) The NVS should maintain a written record or copy of formal advice given, which should be readily available for review. This applies whether the advice is given in writing or verbally. 52) The NVS should supervise the maintenance of appropriate animal health records relating to the protected animals. The format of the records should be agreed with the Home Office Inspector and with the certificate holder (see reference 2). 53) Records should be at least sufficient to show any treatments given to animals or groups of animals and, together with records maintained by other named persons, identify and monitor incidence of disease in the colonies, so that control or corrective action can be taken. As well as a written record of advice or treatment given, there should normally be an indication of the result. Results of required microbiological surveillance programmes should also be recorded. 54) Health records should be regularly reviewed by the NVS and any subsequent action record ed. 55) Records should be kept safely and be readily available to the animal care staff and the Home Office Inspector. 56) In breeding colonies, the recording of colony data (see reference 3, paragraph 3.45) is the certificate holder's responsibility. However, the NVS should agree acceptable performance targets with the care staff and should review the records on a regular basis, to provide assurances that problems are not going unnoticed. GLOSSARYBreeding ("Breeder") Establishments are designated establishments where the common laboratory species, as listed in Schedule 2 of the 1986 Act are bred for use in regulated procedures. The same establishment can be a user and/or supplying establishment. A Certificate of Designation is the document providing official approval for use of an establishment for activities controlled by the 1986 Act, and is held by a senior person, the Certificate Holder, representing the establishment. At issue, conditions are placed on the certificate, and the Holder is responsible for ensuring compliance with these. Designated Establishment is the term given to the place to which a Certificate of Designation issued under the 1986 Act applies. Named Animal Care and Welfare Officer is the term given to the person named on the certificate as responsible for the day-to-day care of the protected animals in specified designated areas. A Named Veterinary Surgeon is the veterinary surgeon specified on the certificate of designation. While it is accepted that veterinary surgeons may deputise for the NVS, no deputies may be specified on the certificate. A Personal Licence is issued to an individual (the "personal licence holder"/licensee) to permit him/her to apply specified regulated procedures that are also authorised by a project licence to specified types of protected animal at a specified place(s). The personal licensee is the person primarily responsible for the care of the protected animals. A Project Licence authorises a programme of scientific work detailed on the schedule to the licence on specified types of protected animal at a specified place(s), and is issued to an individual (the project licence holder/project licensee). Protected animals are those covered by the 1986 Act, which briefly is all vertebrates, including immature forms from mid-gestation/incubation or capacity for independent feeding onwards, and Octopus vulgaris. Regulated procedures (under the 1986 Act) are interventions or omissions applied to protected animals for a scientific purpose, which may cause pain suffering distress or lasting harm. Schedule 1 (of the 1986 Act) gives a list of methods of humane killing that do not require project and personal licence authority. It was revised in 1997 and has an accompanying Code of Practice. Schedule 2 (of the 1986 Act) gives a list of types of animals that must be bred or supplied from a designated breeder or supplier if intended for use in regulated procedures. Scientific Procedure ("User") Establishmentsare designated establishments at which project licences are held and include universities (university departments and medical schools), colleges of further education, government research establishments, pharmaceutical and other industrial research and development laboratories, and contract research laboratories. The same establishment can be a breeding and/or supplying establishment. Supplying Establishments are designated establishments from which Schedule 2 animals that have not been bred on the premises are kept and supplied for use in regulated procedures. The same establishment can be a breeding and/or user establishment. User/Breeder Codes of Practice provide guidance on minimum standards for facilities, housing and care at the respective designated establishment. Veterinary direction (from reference 7) means instructions from a veterinary surgeon who is not necessarily present. Veterinary supervision (from reference 7) means the veterinary surgeon is on the premises and able to respond to a request for assistance if needed. Veterinary supervision that is direct and continuous(from reference 7) means that the veterinary surgeon is present and giving his or her undivided personal attention. REFERENCES/FURTHER READING1) Home Office Guidance on the Operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 [particularly the NVS Section, paragraphs 4.59 - 4.64]. HMSO; London March 2000. 2) Home Office Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures. HMSO: London Feb. 1989 3) Home Office Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals in Designated Breeding and Supplying Establishments. HMSO: London Jan.1995 4) The Humane Killing of Animals under Schedule 1 of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Home Office Code of Practice. HMSO: London Jan. 1997 5) Guidance Notes on the Role of the Named Animal Care and Welfare Officer in the Establishments Designated under the Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 6) Guidance on the Discharge of Animals from the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, LAVA, March 2001 7) RCVS Guide to Professional Conduct (current edition)
|
|||||||
| Accessibility Compliance | Privacy Policy | | ||||||||